Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203810›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Analyzing the enhancement of CNN-YOLO and transformer based architectures for real-time animal detection in complex ecological environments.

Ali Raza, Fareeha Hanif, Heba Abdelgader Mohammed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali RazaDepartment of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. alleerazza786@gmail.com.
Fareeha HanifDepartment of Mathematics, University of Education, Vehari Campus, Vehari, Pakistan.
Heba Abdelgader MohammedTechnical and Engineering Specialties Unit, Applied College, King Khalid University, Mohyel Asser, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. hebaa@kku.edu.sa.

Funding

Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University RGP2/561/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic animal detection has become a critical capability in ecology, conservation, agriculture, and public safety, driven by the rapid growth of visual data collected through camera traps, UAVs, and remote sensors. The necessity of this study arises from the increasing demand to understand and apply these underlying detection techniques in practical domains such as animal husbandry, farming, and livestock management, where timely and accurate animal identification directly impacts productivity, welfare, and safety. Traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong accuracy in static or controlled environments but often face limitations in computational cost and inference speed. In contrast, the You Only Look Once (YOLO) family of one-stage detectors has revolutionized animal detection by achieving real-time performance while maintaining competitive accuracy across challenging geospatial environments. This review provides a chronological synthesis of detection approaches, tracing the evolution from handcrafted features and two-stage CNN-based models to modern YOLO architectures and transformer-enhanced frameworks. A detailed comparative analysis is presented, highlighting trade-offs in accuracy, speed, robustness, and deployment feasibility across diverse datasets, including camera trap imagery, UAV-based surveys, and satellite observations. Persistent challenges such as small-object detection, class imbalance, and limited cross-geographical generalization are discussed alongside enhancement strategies, including attention mechanisms, few-shot learning, and domain adaptation. Furthermore, practical deployment considerations are explored, with emphasis on edge computing platforms such as Jetson Nano, Coral TPU, and UAV-embedded systems. This review adopts a systematic methodology following PRISMA guidelines, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025, from which 142 were included after screening. Comparative findings show that on camera-trap datasets, transformer-augmented YOLO variants achieve up to 94% mAP under controlled illumination, while lightweight YOLOv7-SE and YOLOv8 architectures offer superior real-time performance (≥ 60 FPS) on UAV-based imagery. However, large-scale deployment remains constrained by edge-device memory limits and cross-domain generalization challenges.

Indexed as

EcologyNeural Networks, ComputerRemote Sensing TechnologyAnimalsEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID41203810
PMCPMC12594838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.