ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing bone cancer detection through optimized pre trained deep learning models and explainable AI using the osteosarcoma tumor assessment dataset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ROI-guided relational YOLO-SegNet transformer for lightweight bone tumor segmentation and classification from X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Data to Decision: Integrating Bioinformatics into Glioma Patient Stratification and Immunotherapy Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Temporal Trends and Projected Burden of Bone and Articular Cartilage Malignancies in East Asia: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of explainable vision models for bone tumour detection on radiographs.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Advancements in bone marrow biopsy: the role of omics and artificial intelligence in hematologic diagnostics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of bone cancer using histopathology images is essential for effective and timely treatment. However, contemporary diagnostic methods struggle to achieve high accuracy and interpretability while utilizing computational methods. Although existing methodologies in deep learning are promising, each suffers from significant limitations that arise from fundamental challenges in hyperparameter optimization, explainability, and generalizability across disparate datasets. Such disadvantages serve as barriers to clinical use, underscoring the need for a more reliable and comprehensible diagnostic framework. In this study, an Optimized Deep Learning Framework for Bone Cancer Detection (ODLF-BCD) algorithm is proposed by jointly combining Enhanced Bayesian Optimization (EBO), deep transfer learning from state-of-the-art pre-trained models (i.e., EfficientNet-B4, ResNet50, DenseNet121, InceptionV3, and VGG16), and explainable artificial intelligence, namely Grad-CAM and SHAP. It mitigates the state-of-the-art limitations through hyperparameter tuning, increased transparency, and data augmentation to balance the dataset. Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework, where EfficientNet-B4 achieves 97.9% and 97.3% for binary and multi-class classification, respectively. Its performance is also confirmed with high precision, recall, and F1 score. Explainability facilitates the clinical interpretability of model predictions. Then, the proposed framework offers a robust and efficient alternative solution to the C-RAD, automating bone cancer diagnosis and enhancing the accuracy and transparency of the diagnosis. Its potential usefulness could provide clinicians with strong decision support systems for early and precise cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.