ArticleScientific reports2025
Socio-demographic and clinical factors show no clear association with patient-reported rehabilitation outcomes in schizophrenia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In schizophrenia, patient-reported rehabilitation outcomes provide a unique perspective that goes beyond standard clinical practice, which has traditionally relied on socio-demographic and basic clinical data for diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, there is ongoing debate about whether these routinely collected data meaningfully align with patients' rehabilitation goals. In the current study, we used data from the French network of rehabilitation centers REHABase to predict 19 patient-reported rehabilitation outcomes related to quality of life, self-stigma, self-esteem, insight, and medication adherence in schizophrenia. We employed a SuperLearner ensemble combining a variety of base learners. Predictions were based on 21 socio-demographic and basic clinical predictors. The number of observations ranged from 1,332 (medication adherence) to 1,563 (insight). Approximately three-quarters of the participants were male, with a mean age of 33 years. The SuperLearner ensemble achieved an overall R² of 0.048 (range: 0.01-0.08) on the hold-out testing sets. Most base learners, including general linear models, exhibited a performance gap between the training and testing sets. Overall, socio-demographic and basic clinical factors demonstrated limited ability to explain variations in patient-reported rehabilitation outcomes in schizophrenia. This suggests the need for targeted treatment programs and personalized service provision beyond standard psychiatric practice to enhance rehabilitation care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.