ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of biosecurity practices and risk factors for avian influenza outbreaks in commercial poultry farms in Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) continues to be a major threat to poultry production in Bangladesh, where poultry is a primary source of affordable protein and outbreaks also pose zoonotic risks to humans. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 331 commercial broiler, layer, and Sonali poultry farms to evaluate biosecurity and farm management practices across different poultry production systems in relation to government-recommended biosecurity guidelines, and to identify risk factors associated with avian influenza (AI) outbreaks, as well as to assist in mitigating AI outbreak risks and improving disease prevention in poultry farms. We found that 93.4% of farms were in residential areas and 68.8% of the farms were near waterbodies. A significant number of farms had access to domestic and wild animals, with limited implementation of disinfection and hygiene practices. Overall, most farms did not fully comply with government suggested standard biosecurity and good farm management guidelines. In total, 51 (15.4%) farms reported AI outbreaks with the highest proportion in layer farms (29.1%), followed by broiler (10.6%) and Sonali (7.8%). AI outbreaks were significantly associated with outbreak history on nearby farms, farmers or workers visiting other farms, and farm management by workers or multiple individuals rather than owners. Veterinarian visits were also found to be associated with outbreaks on farms, which may reflect reporting bias rather than causality. Our findings underscore that substantial gaps in biosecurity compliance remain widespread across all farm types. We recommend strengthening biosecurity protocols, addressing environmental risks, and providing comprehensive training programs for farmers to control AI spread, prevent future outbreaks, and ultimately safeguard both poultry and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.