Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203763›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unsupervised spectra information extraction using physics-informed neural networks in the presence of non-linearities and multi-agent problems.

Alessandro Puleio, Pasqualino Gaudio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro PuleioDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. alessandro.puleio@uniroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-7996
Pasqualino GaudioDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-558X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectroscopy covers a huge range of applications in various fields of science, such as physics, biology, chemistry, engineering, and medicine. In some spectroscopic applications, the data analysis of spectra plays a leading role in the determination of the technique's performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and reliability. For this reason, solutions based on machine and deep learning algorithms have been deeply explored as possible alternatives to standard methodologies. Recently, an innovative neural network architecture and training approach have been developed to solve problems where standard supervised deep learning algorithms cannot be used, by exploiting a physics-informed neural network. This new method allows for information extraction from spectra without a supervised approach, i.e. without the need to have controlled experiments where both the spectra and the desired pieces of information to be extracted are known, opening the possibility to solve a huge number of problems where a controlled set (what it is known as training set in machine and deep learning) is present. However, in the previous work, the method has been presented only for simple and linear cases, limiting the range of applications of this new method. In this work, the previous physics-informed deep learning methodology is generalised to tackle both non-linear and multi-agent cases. The methodology, once it has been formally introduced, will be tested on synthetic cases and compared with standard supervised algorithms.

Indexed as

CalibrationDeep learningPhysics-Informed neural networkSpectroscopyUnsupervised processing

Identifiers

PMID41203763
PMCPMC12594914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.