ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of electrode placement on electrical stimulation for wound healing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective wound healing is directly linked to survival. Long-term unhealed wounds impair quality of life and incur significant costs. Electrical stimulation (ES) influences wound healing by modulating signals that regulate cell proliferation, migration, and immune response. In ES treatment, the placement of electrodes is a critical factor, as it impacts the environmental conditions and cell polarity essential for wound healing. This study analyzed the effects of various electrode placements to identify the optimal setup for accelerating wound healing. The optimized electrode placement enhanced wound healing in a rat model of full-thickness skin defect over 17 days, and the electrical field (EF) was analyzed using simulations. In-vivo, the optimized electrode placement achieved a 16.7% reduction in wound area compared to the control group. In simulation, a forward vector of the EF from the optimized electrode placement was observed. The findings suggest that optimizing the electrode placement for ES is beneficial to wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.