Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated inspection of P&ID object recognition using deep learning.

Ji-Beob Kim, Yoochan Moon, Seung-Tae Han, Duhwan Mun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Beob KimSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Yoochan MoonSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Tae HanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Duhwan MunSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. dhmun@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy RS-2024-00419010National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1A2C2005879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have focused on digitizing piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) to enhance their applicability across industries. Even with the application of digitization technology, correcting errors in object recognition remains time-consuming, and because correction is performed manually, errors may persist. To address these issues, we propose a novel method for inspecting object recognition results in P&IDs. For unrecognized object inspection, patches are generated, and a deep learning-based classifier identifies missing elements. For misrecognized object inspection, optimal inspection methods are applied depending on the type of error, enabling effective detection of misrecognized objects. Specifically, the proposed misrecognition inspection methods include deep learning-based feature vector similarity calculation, text error detection based on distance-based detection, and line error detection through intersection-case inspection method. The proposed method was validated through experiments conducted using P&IDs from actual industrial sites. The results showed that unrecognized object inspection achieved a recall of 100%. Misrecognized object inspection achieved an accuracy of 99.2% and an F1 score of 96.7% for symbols, an accuracy of 95.8% and an F1 score of 97.3% for text, and 100% accuracy and F1 score for lines. Overall, error correction time was reduced by approximately 40%.

Indexed as

Deep learningError detectionFeature representationObject inspectionPiping and instrumentation diagram

Identifiers

PMID41203750
PMCPMC12594774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.