ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative insights into posthumous organ donation attitudes in chronically ill and healthy Egyptians.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention, yet a persistent global organ shortage threatens patient survival. In Egypt, cultural, religious, and legal factors significantly influence donation willingness, contributing to persistently low consent rates. This study aimed to: (1) compare attitudes toward posthumous organ donation between patients with chronic illness and healthy individuals; (2) assess their preferences for eleven distinct consent models; and (3) evaluate awareness of Egyptian organ donation laws and how this and key socio-demographic predictors influence willingness to donate. This cross-sectional study included 6,000 participants (3,000 patients and 3,000 healthy individuals) from two Egyptian governorates. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling. Structured interviews and self-administered questionnaires collected data on socio-demographics, donation knowledge, and consent preferences. Participants ranked eleven consent models and assessed their awareness of key Egyptian organ donation laws. Patients exhibited a significantly higher willingness to donate posthumously (91%) compared to healthy individuals (60%) (p < 0.01). Written consent was preferred over verbal consent in both groups (75.2% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), emphasizing the importance of formal documentation. Incentivized donation was more favored by patients (59.6%) than healthy participants (54.7%) (p = 0.001), indicating incentives could enhance participation. Among patients, chronic illness was the primary motivator for donation, rendering socio-demographic variables less relevant. However, logistic regression identified key predictors among healthy participants. Participants aged 45-65 years were significantly less willing to donate than those over 65 years (AOR = 0.41, p = 0.01). Those in education (AOR = 2.07, p = 0.006) and manual workers (AOR = 1.94, p = 0.004) were more likely to donate than the unemployed. Higher socioeconomic status (C1/C2 and A/B) was associated with lower donation willingness than the lowest SES (D) (AOR = 0.34, 0.31, p < 0.001). Greater legal awareness was significantly associated with higher willingness to donate (p < 0.001). Chronic illness enhances donation willingness independent of socio-demographics. Health authorities should implement adaptive consent frameworks to enhance organ donation rates in Egypt, including simplified, surrogate-inclusive models for patients. Structured legal education programs for the general public to address knowledge gaps are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.