Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203704›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning and bayesian network based on fuzzy AHP framework for risk assessment in process units.

Hassan Mandali, Elham Keighobadi, Hossein Ebrahimi, Saber Moradi Hanifi, Seyed Majid Ayat, Mohammad Ghashghaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hassan MandaliDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elham KeighobadiDepartment of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein EbrahimiOccupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saber Moradi HanifiOccupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. sabermoradi22@yahoo.com.
Seyed Majid AyatChemical Engineering Group, Pardis College, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad GhashghaeiDepartment of Health Safety and Environment Engineering, School of Public Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety of process units. Artificial intelligence has become increasingly prevalent in risk assessment and prediction, offering the potential for more precise outcomes when integrated with other techniques. This study is both descriptive and analytical in nature. The dataset utilized comprises 160 deviations identified through the HAZOP technique. A variety of evaluation algorithms were employed in this study, ranging from ensemble methods like Random Forest, Hist Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and CatBoost, to traditional methods such as Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). This broad array of algorithms enabled a comprehensive comparison of diverse modeling approaches, encompassing conventional statistical methods and cutting-edge machine-learning techniques. Among the algorithms tested, Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost exhibited exceptional performance on the training and test datasets, achieving near-perfect AUC scores and accuracy values of 1.0000. In the fusion of Bayesian networks and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), the options "Corrosion in Electrolysis Cells" and "Damage and Explosion of Cells" were given higher priority over other options. The findings from this study suggest that machine learning techniques, along with the amalgamation of Bayesian networks and MCDM, can serve as effective tools for risk assessment and the prioritization of risk options. By leveraging these methodologies, suitable control and preventive measures can be implemented to mitigate risks effectively.

Indexed as

Bayesian NetworkHAZOPMachine learningMCDMRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41203704
PMCPMC12594850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.