ArticleNature communications2025
Deep learning models simultaneously trained on multiple datasets improve base-editing activity prediction.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The landscape and trajectory of global CRISPR therapeutics.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- RNA design: update on computational frameworks and programs for inverse RNA folding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-derived base editors (BE) enable precise single nucleotide substitution without introducing double-stranded DNA breaks. Apart from the base editing enzymes, efficient base editing strongly depends on both the CRISPR guide RNA (gRNA) efficiency and the edited position. Here, we show that the accuracy of BE gRNA design can be significantly improved by generating more data and by introducing deep neural networks trained on multiple different datasets simultaneously. Generating ~20,000 gRNAs for A•T to G•C and C•G to T•A conversions, we present such deep learning models, which also allow users to do dataset-aware predictions. The methods are available online and as stand-alone software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.