ArticleScientific reports2025
Forecasting compressive strength of concrete containing rice husk ash using various machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) into concrete improves the structure’s compressive strength (CS) and durability and aids sustainability by lowering carbon emissions. This paper evaluates the application of twelve machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the CS of concrete containing RHA. The dataset used to train, test, and validate the model comprised 500 experimental samples and 30 data points sourced externally. Through stepwise regression, seven input features were chosen: water-to-binder ratio (W/B), cement (C), superplasticizer (SP), water (W), RHA, coarse aggregate (CA), and fine aggregate (FA). Among the evaluated models, support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and null‒space SVR (NuSVR) models emerged as the best performing, each attaining R² values over 0.93. DTR performed weakest, with R² values below 0.53, illustrating the importance of algoRhythm selection. The study’s results reaffirm the importance of RHA content and the W/B ratio as the two major determinants of the CS increase. To assist practitioners iapplyingng the trained models, a simple graphical user interface (GUI) was created to allow engineers to quickly evaluate CS and refine concrete mix designs. The combination of sophisticated ML methods with the data on RHA concrete will therefore support the overarching strategy to achieve sustainability in construction and high operational reliability of structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.