ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-criteria approach to ESG-based portfolio optimization incorporating historical performance, forward-looking insights, and credibilistic CVaR: a case study on the DJIA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a new framework for portfolio management that incorporates sustainability considerations in the form of environmental, social, and governance risks (ESG) alongside the impact of historical and projected company performance, as well as a fuzzy environment to account for expected return uncertainty. To account for market and investor uncertainties, we integrate the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) risk measure with credibility theory. Unlike traditional portfolio optimization methods, which rely heavily on probabilistic assumptions and may fail to capture real-world uncertainty, our model uses fuzzy logic principles to more realistically represent uncertainty when historical data is incomplete or expert opinions are inaccurate. To assess historical and projected company performance, we use data extracted from quarterly company reports and employ advanced text analytics tools such as FinBERT sentiment analysis and the NotebookLM platform. These tools enable us to extract subtle insights and sentiment trends that are critical for predicting future performance. Empirical validation of the proposed framework is conducted using historical stock return data from the DJIA. A diversified portfolio of assets is selected and the optimal stock allocation is obtained under the proposed credibilistic CVaR (CCVaR) validation approach. The results show that the portfolios optimized under the CCVaR framework offer superior adverse risk control and greater resilience to market volatility compared to traditional approaches. At the end of the paper, the proposed model is compared with the traditional equal weight strategy and the results are presented. This study provides valuable practical insights for risk-averse investors and portfolio managers seeking stronger and more stable investment strategies in uncertain financial environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.