Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203671›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid approach leveraging meta-heuristic and ensemble learning for time-sensitive prediction of pollutant concentrations.

Priya Kansal, Jatin Bedi, Sushma Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priya KansalComputer Science and Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab, 147004, India. pkansal_phd22@thapar.edu.
Jatin BediComputer Science and Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab, 147004, India.
Sushma JainComputer Science and Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab, 147004, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which capture localized features, and long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), which focus on long-term dependencies, often face challenges in achieving higher accuracy for time series prediction tasks. To address this limitation, this study proposes a hybrid deep learning model that integrates CNN, LSTM, the reptile search algorithm (RSA), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) for pollutant concentration forecasting. Initially, the raw pollutant concentration data undergoes cleaning and normalization via a Min-Max scaler. The processed sequences are then separately fed into LSTM and CNN models to extract weighted features. RSA is applied to optimize these features, while XGB computes feature importance scores, quantifying the contribution of each selected feature to the predictive performance. The proposed model predicts pollutants such as [Formula: see text], CO, SO[Formula: see text], and NO[Formula: see text] up to ten days in advance for urban Indian settings. Comparative evaluations against benchmark models-including Transformer, CNN, BiLSTM, BiRNN, ANN, and BiGRU-demonstrate that the hybrid approach yields consistently superior accuracy and robustness. The hybrid model achieves substantially lower errors and higher [Formula: see text] scores across all pollutants, validating its reliability for long-horizon air quality forecasting.

Indexed as

Air pollutantsEnsemble learningHybrid modelMeta-heuristic optimisation

Identifiers

PMID41203671
PMCPMC12595109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.