ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of multisensory packaging on taste perception, emotional responses, and willingness to pay for chocolate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Product packaging serves as a powerful multisensory cue that shapes consumer expectations, emotional responses, and purchasing behavior-often before the product is even consumed. This study investigated how color, texture, scent, and unboxing interaction jointly influence the perceived quality, taste experience, emotional engagement, and economic valuation of a chocolate product. Thirty-six participants were assigned to one of six groups defined by between-subjects factors (scent: present vs. absent; texture: smooth, raised dots, embossed pattern) and evaluated six boxes that varied within-subjects in color (white, purple) and unboxing interaction (lift-off, snail-fold, slide-and-tilt). Each box contained the same chocolate, and participants completed questionnaires on sensory perception, product-package congruency, emotional response, and willingness to pay. Results revealed that unboxing interaction significantly shaped perceived attractiveness and semantic impressions, with more complex openings rated more positively. Texture and scent jointly influenced perceived flavor intensity, taste persistence, and emotional valence. Scent enhanced perceived luxury and purchase intention but reduced overall liking, smoothness, and willingness to taste again, potentially due to hedonic overload, in which the added chocolate scent increased sensory stimulation beyond an optimal level. Color-texture combinations further modulated emotional responses and congruency judgments. While these findings underscore the importance of multisensory coherence in packaging, interpretation is limited by the small sample, reliance on self-report measures, and the absence of physiological indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.