ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal-based auxiliary diagnosis for pediatric community acquired pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for pneumonia diagnosis: a systematic review of multimodal learning, fusion strategies, and explainability.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia using multimodal fusion of chest radiographs and clinical data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains one of the leading causes of death among pediatric patients under the age of 5, making timely and accurate diagnosis crucial for subsequent treatment. While numerous artificial intelligence diagnostic methods for pneumonia have shown reliable results, most of them still exhibit significant limitations: (a) They only rely on single-modality data, which have limitations in capturing comprehensive clinical information; (b) They do not consider differences in postures among pediatric patients, resulting in constrained diagnostic performance and generalizability. To address these challenges, we construct a real-world pediatric CAP dataset from tertiary hospital records, and develop a multimodal framework for the precise diagnosis of pediatric CAP. In order to simulate clinical diagnostic workflows, the developed model not only integrates frontal chest X-ray images but also considers laboratory test results and clinical texts, enabling comprehensive diagnosis of diverse symptoms, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and generalizability. Experimental results based on the constructed dataset demonstrate that our multimodal approach achieves an impressive diagnostic result, with an accuracy of 94.2%, showing significant improvement over single-modality baselines and validating the potential as an auxiliary diagnostic tool to enhance the clinical practice for pediatric CAP screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.