ArticleScientific reports2025
Nonnegative matrix factorization incorporating domain specific constraints for four dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern electron microscopy enables the acquisition of extremely large datasets, necessitating optimized machine learning techniques, such as dimensionality reduction and clustering, to extract material insights. We propose a novel nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) technique that integrates domain-specific constraints inherent to electron microscopy, including spatial resolution and continuous intensity features without downward-convex peaks. This constrained NMF was applied to four-dimensional (4D) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Using the constrained NMF, both simulated and actual experimental data were successfully decomposed into interpretable diffractions and maps that cannot be achieved using principal component analysis (PCA) and primitive NMF methods. Additionally, hierarchical clustering was optimized based on diffraction similarity, which is a combination of a polar coordinate transformation and uniaxial cross-correlation. Then, nanometer-sized crystalline precipitates embedded in an amorphous metallic glass, ZrCuAl, were successfully detected and classified according to their diffraction patterns. The present scheme is broadly applicable across various characterization techniques, including hyperspectral imaging, and effectively mitigates the known artifacts found in conventional machine learning techniques that rely solely on mathematical constraints without domain-specific knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.