Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203662›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of a removable prosthesis on chewing ability, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

Rasha A Alamoush, Hebatullah N Abu-Mahfouz, Rasha J Rahhal, Marwa M Alnsour, Omar M Alakhras, Renad S Thaher, Julfikar Haider, Mahmoud K Al-Omiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rasha A AlamoushDepartment of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Queen Rania Street, Amman, 11942, Jordan. r.amoush@ju.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-3697
Hebatullah N Abu-MahfouzSchool of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9293-6617
Rasha J RahhalSchool of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5286-3588
Marwa M AlnsourDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Omar M AlakhrasSchool of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7918-0182
Renad S ThaherSchool of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6732-6629
Julfikar HaiderDepartment of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Mahmoud K Al-OmiriDepartment of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Queen Rania Street, Amman, 11942, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of removable prostheses on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), the effects of removable prostheses on chewing ability and the effects of prosthesis type (Removable partial denture RPD versus complete denture CD) and sociodemographic factors on both chewing ability and OHRQoL. Data from 90 participants were collected using a questionnaire. Chewing ability and OHRQoL were assessed before and after treatment through questionnaires. A two-tailed α of 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were applied to identify statistically significant results in this survey. Differences between the RPD and CD treatment groups in terms of demographic variables (gender, age, income, education level, smoking status, medical history, and social connections) and previous denture experience were analysed using the Mann‒Whitney U test. Participants with RPD or CD demonstrated significant improvements in chewing ability and OHRQoL post-treatment (p < 0.05), except for females in the RPD group, who showed no significant changes. Compared with the CD group, the RPD group had significantly better chewing ability both before (p < 0.001) and after (p = 0.027) treatment. The RPD group also reported better outcomes in many aspects, including less jaw pain, greater comfort while eating, and improved denture stability (p < 0.05). Stepwise regression revealed that higher income and smoking were associated with better pre-treatment outcomes, whereas having multiple dentures and smoking predicted worse post-treatment chewing scores. Notably, higher post-treatment chewing scores were associated with improved OHRQoL. Both the RPD and CD groups reported improved chewing ability and OHRQoL, with RPD resulting in superior functional outcomes. Sociodemographic factors such as income, sex, age, and smoking habits influenced the results both before and after treatment. These findings highlight the importance of individualised patient assessment and support the clinical value of RPDs in partially edentulous patients.

Indexed as

Denture, Partial, RemovableMasticationPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overDenture, CompleteFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesChewing abilityComplete dentures (CDs)Denture treatment outcomesOral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)Removable partial dentures (RPDs)

Identifiers

PMID41203662
PMCPMC12594768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.