ReviewNature communications2025
Sample delivery methods for protein X-ray crystallography with a special focus on sample consumption.
Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A simple and practical approach for protein serial crystallography using grease matrix and large-area support film.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Polyethylene Terephthalate Film-Based Sample Holder for Fixed-Target Serial Femtosecond Crystallography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated microbatch-under-oil phase diagrams to rationalize serial crystallography sample preparation.IUCrJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serial crystallography (SX) has revolutionized structural biology by enabling high-resolution structure determination for important classes of proteins, including the study of relevant biomolecular reaction mechanisms. However, one of the ongoing challenges in this field remains the efficient use of precious macromolecule samples whose availability is often limited. Reducing sample consumption is thus critical in maximizing the potential of SX conducted at powerful X-ray sources such as synchrotrons and X-ray free-electron lasers (XFEL) to expand to a broader range of significant biological samples, gaining insights into unraveled biological reaction mechanisms. This review focuses on three primary sample delivery systems: fixed-targets, liquid injection, and hybrid methods, each with distinct advantages and limitations concerning sample consumption. The progress and challenges associated with these methods, highlighting advancements in reducing sample consumption and thus enabling the study of more diverse biological samples, are summarized. We compare the currently reported sample delivery methods in view of the minimum amount of sample required to obtain a full data set and discuss how the current approaches compare to this theoretical minimum. With this overview, we aim to provide a critical and comprehensive assessment of the current methods and experimental realizations for sample delivery in SX with proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.