Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203635›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Sample delivery methods for protein X-ray crystallography with a special focus on sample consumption.

Abhik Manna, Diandra Doppler, Manasa P Sripati, Mukul Sonker, Alexandra Ros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhik MannaSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8681-6702
Diandra DopplerSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-3936
Manasa P SripatiCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5619-3570
Mukul SonkerSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-8410
Alexandra RosSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. aros2@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-8331

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1231306National Science Foundation (NSF) 1935994National Science Foundation (NSF) 2153503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial crystallography (SX) has revolutionized structural biology by enabling high-resolution structure determination for important classes of proteins, including the study of relevant biomolecular reaction mechanisms. However, one of the ongoing challenges in this field remains the efficient use of precious macromolecule samples whose availability is often limited. Reducing sample consumption is thus critical in maximizing the potential of SX conducted at powerful X-ray sources such as synchrotrons and X-ray free-electron lasers (XFEL) to expand to a broader range of significant biological samples, gaining insights into unraveled biological reaction mechanisms. This review focuses on three primary sample delivery systems: fixed-targets, liquid injection, and hybrid methods, each with distinct advantages and limitations concerning sample consumption. The progress and challenges associated with these methods, highlighting advancements in reducing sample consumption and thus enabling the study of more diverse biological samples, are summarized. We compare the currently reported sample delivery methods in view of the minimum amount of sample required to obtain a full data set and discuss how the current approaches compare to this theoretical minimum. With this overview, we aim to provide a critical and comprehensive assessment of the current methods and experimental realizations for sample delivery in SX with proteins.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayProteinsProtein ConformationX-RaysProteins

Identifiers

PMID41203635
PMCPMC12594859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.