ArticleNature communications2025
Discriminating single-molecule binding events from diffraction-limited fluorescence.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discriminating single-molecule binding events from diffraction-limited fluorescence.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule localization microscopy enables high-resolution imaging of molecular interactions, but discriminating molecular binding types has traditionally relied on complex strategies, such as multiple dyes, time-division techniques, or kinetic analysis, that are asynchronous, invasive, or time-consuming. Here, we uncover previously overlooked spatiotemporal information embedded within diffraction-limited fluorescence, enabling synchronous classification of individual binding event videos using only a single fluorescent dye. Building on this insight, we propose a Temporal-to-Context Convolutional Neural Network (T2C CNN), which integrates long-term spatial convolutions, shallow cross-connected blocks, and a pooling-free structure to enhance contextual representation while preserving fine-grained temporal features. Applied to DNA-PAINT experiments, T2C CNN achieves up to 94.76% classification accuracy and outperforms state-of-the-art video classification models by 15-25 percentage points. Our approach enables rapid and precise binding-type recognition from fluorescence video data, reducing observation time from minutes to seconds and facilitating high-throughput single-molecule imaging without requiring multiple dye channels or extended kinetic measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.