Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203606›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Critical length screening enables 19% efficiency in thick-film organic solar cells.

Yuan Meng, Bo Cheng, Dongcheng Jiang, Jiangkai Sun, Jiawei Qiao, Beibei Shi, Haisheng Ma, Jingtian Zhu, Lianbo Wang, Runzheng Gu and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spin-manipulation via novel MoPSNature communications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yuan MengSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Bo ChengSchool of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Colloidal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Dongcheng JiangSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jiangkai SunSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jiawei QiaoSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Beibei ShiSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Haisheng MaSchool of Chemistry and Environment, Heeger Beijing Research and Development Center, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Jingtian ZhuSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lianbo WangSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Runzheng GuSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Peng LuSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanna SunSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Science of Material Creation and Energy Conversion, Science Center for Material Creation and Energy Conversion, Institute of Frontier Chemistry, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China. ynsun@sdu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyan DuSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-2988
Xia GuoSchool of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Colloidal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Ke GaoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Science of Material Creation and Energy Conversion, Science Center for Material Creation and Energy Conversion, Institute of Frontier Chemistry, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
He YanDepartment of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1780-8308
Maojie ZhangSchool of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Colloidal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. mjzhang@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-5856
Feng ChenSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-9810
Yanming SunSchool of Chemistry and Environment, Heeger Beijing Research and Development Center, Beihang University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-3199
Xiaotao HaoSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. haoxt@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-6545
Hang YinSchool of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. hyin@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-7238

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12204272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commercialization of organic solar cells (OSCs) requires thick-film active layers, yet current thick-film-compatible acceptor selection based on zero-field mobility is unreliable due to methodological inconsistencies in experimental protocols, fitting models, and single-carrier device configurations. Existing literature indicates that the zero-field mobility in high-performance thick-film devices shows negligible differences compared to thin-film counterparts, thereby invalidating its significance as a selection criterion. This study introduces a protocol identifying critical length - an intrinsic property distinct from zero-field mobility - as the decisive factor for thick-film OSC performance. Comparative studies reveal that enlarged acceptor domains with high critical length yield increased hopping frequency, improved charge mobility and reduced field-dependent, collectively enhancing performance. Applying this criterion, we identify BTP-eC9 as a general acceptor, achieving 19.0% efficiency in thick-film D18:L8-BO:BTP-eC9 OSCs. This work not only demonstrates the fabrication of high-performance thick-film OSCs, but fundamentally advances material screening methodology specifically tailored for thick-film-compatible organic semiconductors.

Identifiers

PMID41203606
PMCPMC12594902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.