Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203578›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2026

Controlled trial of cervical cancer screening frequency among human-papillomavirus-vaccinated women.

Mònica Ortega Llobet, Penelope Gray, Iacopo Baussano, K Miriam Elfström, Tiina Eriksson, Camilla Lagheden, Pekka Nieminen, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Joakim Dillner, Ville N Pimenoff and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00534638 phase4completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Vaccination Strategies Using GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2014Enrolled34,412ConditionsInfections, PapillomavirusArmsCervarix, Engerix-B
NCT02149030 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Cervical Screening in HPV Vaccinated Women - a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere UniversityRan2014 to 2025Enrolled6,958ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3ArmsCytological screening in A1 and A3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mònica Ortega LlobetCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-1880
Penelope GrayCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-4734
Iacopo BaussanoInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
K Miriam ElfströmCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-7226
Tiina ErikssonMedical Faculty, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Camilla LaghedenCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pekka NieminenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna Söderlund-StrandDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Joakim DillnerCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-6506
Ville N PimenoffCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matti LehtinenCentre for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-0535

Funding

Cancerfonden 20 1198 PjFCancerfonden 20 1199 UsFCancerfonden 21 1863 PjFCentre for Innovative Medicine (CIMED) FoUI-976207Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 847845Stockholm county research grants (ALF) RS2020-0731World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical screening frequency has not been studied in vaccinees. As the major risk factor, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is declining due to vaccination. We report a trial to assess the effectiveness of cervical screening frequency among women HPV-vaccinated as early adolescents (NCT02149030). In 2013, 5626 1992-1995-born women, who had received three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine at ages 12-15 between 2007 and 2010 in a community-randomized vaccination trial (NCT00534638), were allocated at age 22 into high-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by even birth date (Arm A1) or into low-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by odd birth date (Arm A2). One thousand three hundred thirty-three women who received HPV16/18 vaccination at age 18 attended a safety of low intensity-screening arm (Arm A3). Low-intensity screening, where low-grade cytological abnormalities were not revealed for 6 years, was compared to the standard high-intensity screening used in Finland at the time. The prevalence of cytological and HPV findings was calculated at ages 22/25/28. The hazard ratio of histopathologically confirmed immediate cervical cancer precursors (HSIL/CIN2+) among participants was compared between low- and high-intensity screening arms. The overall occurrence of CIN2+ was comparable in Arms A1, 0.70% and A2, 0.66%, with the corresponding hazard ratio at age 28 being 0.97 (95% confidence intervals, 0.50-1.88). By age 28, the occurrence of vaccine-HPV types 16/18 was reduced up to 88% in the 12-to-15 compared to 18-year-old HPV-vaccinated women. In conclusion, the risk of CIN2+ was similar for HPV-vaccinated women who attended low-intensity cervical screening compared to high-intensity screening most likely due to the decline of oncogenic HPVs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFinlandHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansVaccinationVaginal SmearsYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinescervical screeningHPV‐vaccinationRCT

Identifiers

PMID41203578
PMCPMC12875181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.