ArticleeNeuro2025
Reliable Single-Trial Detection of Saccade-Related Lambda Responses with Independent Component Analysis.
Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In natural, free-viewing settings, visual perception is driven by a series of saccades and fixations. Perceptual mechanisms are typically studied through averaged fixation-related potentials generated from simultaneous eye-tracking and EEG recordings. Lambda responses following fixation onsets signal the arrival of new visual input to the primary visual cortex. In our study, we investigate the use and preprocessing parameter dependence of independent component analysis (ICA) in separating the lambda response from other neural sources. In our experiment, 10 subjects (2 males and 8 females) viewed 80 art paintings in natural, free-viewing settings, during which EEG data were recorded. Our results show that unique lambda response components can be detected reliably and individual lambda waves can be extracted in a single-trial manner, without signal averaging. ICA decomposition is most sensitive to high-pass filtering producing best results with a minimum 1 Hz filtering. We also propose a method that automatically and accurately identifies the lambda component among other independent components for further lambda peak detection. These individual lambda waves can then be used to study saccade-related modulation effects without losing temporal and spatial resolution. The novelty of our method is the automatic detection of lambda components and extraction lambda waves, which is a new approach in saccade/fixation and visual perception research under naturalistic viewing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.