ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Atrial Leadless Pacemaker to Replace Atrial Pacing From a Failed Conventional Transvenous Atrial Lead.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Double-click on the ventricle: ventricular safety pacing triggered by right atrial lead dislodgement in a patient after right atrial tumor resection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeadless atrial pacing provides a novel solution for patients with atrial lead failure where extraction is not feasible. The integration of leadless systems with existing cardiac devices offers a promising approach for managing patients in whom lead extraction is considered too risky. CASE SUMMARY: A 73-year-old man with heart block, after having undergone cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker implantation 10 years ago, presented with atrial lead failure. Owing to recent double-lung transplantation and high surgical risk, lead extraction was avoided. A leadless atrial pacemaker was successfully implanted, restoring atrioventricular synchrony by using the atrial sensing from the existing right atrial lead. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates the integration of conventional right atrial lead sensing with leadless pacing technology, offering a safe and effective alternative when lead extraction is too risky. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Leadless atrial pacing integrated with existing cardiac device leads offers a safe and effective alternative for restoring atrioventricular synchrony in high-risk patients in whom lead extraction or revision is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.