ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Improving staff awareness of sensory aid needs and dementia status in an old age ward.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaving initially done our critical appraisal of various studies, we found that geriatric wards have a higher prevalence of delirium and dementia. Among this older population, sensory aids were found to be important in orientating delirious patients, and deficits in vision/hearing were associated with an increased risk of delirium. Delirium and dementia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This quality improvement project aimed to increase staff awareness of patient sensory aid needs and thus improve patient care as a result.
methodsWe started off with a driver diagram to identify what the primary and secondary drivers are for improving the quality of care for patients with sensory impairment. Of the drivers discussed, we believed that we could have a meaningful impact on improving sensory impairment awareness among the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on the ward. We then went through our Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles, which were as follows: PDSA cycle 1, where I and my two colleagues educated the MDT on how to use the electronic patient records property form checklist, which was being underused. This form tracks whether patients require sensory aids. We did three teaching sessions during board rounds and audited the use of this form over time. PDSA cycle 2 used a laminated bedside checklist that is filled in by the MDT and is used as a visual reminder of the patient's sensory impairment status.
resultsThe EPR form completion rate increased by 14% over a period of 4 weeks, although this was not statistically significant. 18% of the bedside checklists were filled in, which was statistically significant. Both interventions in combination led to a statistically significant increase in sensory impairment awareness, with a 32% decrease in sensory aid unknown rates, a 40% decrease in dementia unknown rates and a 56% decrease in both sensory and dementia unknown rates. Delirium status was not formally assessed in this QIP due to documentation inconsistencies; however, its relevance remains acknowledged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.