ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
New insights into optimal storage conditions for raw Pu-erh tea: modulating post-fermentation flavor via microbial metabolism under controlled water activity.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Chemistry of Time: Flavor Evolution and Functional Health Benefits in Aged Tea.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe post-fermentation storage of raw Pu-erh tea (RPT) is a key process that contributes to the development of its characteristic aged flavor. Microbial activity plays a vital role in this transformation which strongly influencedby water activity (Aw). However, its specific effects on microbial community dynamics and associated metabolic contributions during RPT storage remain unclear.
objectivesThis study aims to elucidate the mechanisms by which different Aw levels shape microbial communities and drive flavor compound formation during RPT storage.
methodsRPT samples were stored under defined Aw conditions, during which microbial communities were characterized using Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequencing, and flavor metabolites were analyzed through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Correlation analyses and core strain-inoculated fermentations under simulated and realistic Aw conditions were conducted to investigate the relationship between microbial dynamics and flavor evolution.
resultsControlled Aw conditions significantly influenced the microbial composition and flavor chemistry of RPT. Aw above 0.60 enriched fungal genera such as Papiliotrema, Hannaella, Toxicocladosporium, and Pestalotiopsis, which were strongly correlated with the accumulation of aging-associated terpenoids (e.g., α-terpineol, terpinen-4-ol, cedrol, linalool) and kokumi-active compounds including flavoalkaloids and amino acid derivatives. A core yeast isolate, Papiliotrema flavescens, exhibited metabolic activity at Aw > 0.60 under both simulated and realistic storage conditions. It produced β-glucosidase, which promoted the hydrolysis of glycosidic precursors and the accumulation of linalool and methyl salicylate, confirming its role in microbial-driven flavor development. However, Aw levels exceeding 0.70 promoted the formation of undesirable volatiles like N,N-dimethyl-propanamide, toluene, and isophorone, indicating potential quality deterioration.
conclusionAw is a pivotal parameter that connects storage safety with microbial-driven flavor development in RPT. An optimal range of 0.60-0.70 promotes beneficial transformations while minimizing off-odor risks. These findings highlight Aw regulation as a practical and novel strategy for improving aging quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.