Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41202824›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2026

Development and Testing of an Owner-Reported Outcome Measure of Clinical Signs and Quality of Life in Dogs Treated With Chemotherapy.

Jenny Harris, Katie Sutton, Quentin Fournier, Jo Armes, Emma Ream, Nicholas Bacon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny HarrisFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-117X
Katie SuttonFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-1454
Quentin FournierLumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Alton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-9459
Jo ArmesFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-0796
Emma ReamFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5436-8036
Nicholas BaconAURA Veterinary, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5190-5342

Funding

The Kennel Club Charitable Trust, UK 90306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of mortality in older dogs. Despite the prevalence of chemotherapy in canine oncology, a good understanding of owners' observations of side effects and clinical signs in real time is still lacking. Owners' perceptions and reporting of clinical signs play an important role in monitoring a dog's condition during treatment and the use of digital owner-reported outcome measures could prove efficient in tracking chemotherapy side effects in the home environment. This could improve care and draws inspiration from the human use of patient-reported outcome measures in oncology. We aimed to develop and test a prototype digital measure for monitoring clinical signs and health-related quality of life in dogs undergoing chemotherapy, designed to facilitate owner participation in monitoring and support veterinary care. A rapid literature review was conducted to identify existing measures and their methodological limitations. Items were generated based on the Veterinary Comparative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, existing client-reported outcome measures, and expert veterinary opinion. Proof-of-Concept testing was performed with 29 dog owners with pets undergoing chemotherapy. Participants completed daily assessments of their dog's clinical signs and weekly quality of life surveys over a 21-day period. A sub-sample participated in cognitive interviews to assess content validity and acceptability. Descriptive statistics were used to assess clinical signs and quality of life scores. Internal consistency and item discrimination were evaluated, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. High adherence was reported, with a median of 21 daily and 3 weekly assessments completed. Participants found the assessments acceptable and beneficial. Fatigue, polydipsia, and anorexia were the most frequently reported clinical signs. Dogs experienced a median of 3 different clinical signs. The quality-of-life scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84). Participants appreciated the daily assessments, found them easy to complete, and believed the measure could help improve monitoring and decision-making during chemotherapy. The prototype tool, the Canine Cancer Outcome Measure (CAN-COM), demonstrated feasibility and acceptability for use by owners in the home environment for dogs undergoing chemotherapy. With further refinement and validation, such a tool could improve the monitoring of adverse events and support decision-making in veterinary oncology, enhancing the welfare of canine cancer patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDog DiseasesNeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansMaleOwnershipSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic Agentsadverse events monitoringcanine oncologychemotherapyclient‐reported outcome measuresclinical signsquality of lifeveterinary palliative care

Identifiers

PMID41202824
PMCPMC12875753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.