ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Mapping the Conflict Between Oral Health and Patient Autonomy in Dentistry: A Unified Qualitative-Quantitative Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsPatients' interests encompass both medical indication and their autonomous requests; however, these two aspects often conflict. We aimed to map this ethical dilemma considering dentists' and patients' perspectives.
methodsWe included patient and dentist subsamples, applying quotas for sex and leadership experience among dentists, and quotas for sex and age among patients. We conducted semi-structured interviews, developed codes using prior theory, and inspected the coded dataset using Epistemic Network Analysis, a method that visualizes code co-occurrence patterns.
resultsDentists' narratives indicated a preference for performing esthetic procedures that also had a medical indication; albeit, they encouraged patients to make treatment decisions by informing adequately. Patients often justified esthetic procedures by associating esthetics with health, while in other cases, they based decisions on prior experiences and perceived comfort.
conclusionEthical theory adopted from literature was insufficient to fully capture complexities, particularly in-patient narratives. These findings indicate a need for novel ethical approaches that better reflect patients' reasoning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If individual dentists or higher-level stakeholders advocate for change, they must account for patient's subjective perspectives and lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.