Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41202482›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2026

Medication for opioid use disorder among adolescents entering specialty treatment for opioid use disorder and trends in the US, 2017-2022.

Jesse S Boggis, Thadryan Sweeney, Lisa A Marsch, Wesley J Marrero, Kenneth A Feder, Erika L Moen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesse S BoggisThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH. Electronic address: jesse.s.boggis.gr@dartmouth.edu.
Thadryan SweeneyDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.
Lisa A MarschThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.
Wesley J MarreroCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Kenneth A FederDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Erika L MoenThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.

Funding

Training in the Science of Co-Occurring DisordersT32DA037202 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Integrated Model of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment to Increase Naloxone Co-Prescribing in Primary CareF31DA060690 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BOGGIS, JESSE S · 2024 to 2024
$49k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA060690NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional societies recommend that adolescents with opioid use disorder (OUD) receive medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). This cross-sectional study examined the association between adolescent specialty treatment episodes for OUD with planned MOUD use compared to adults over time.

methodsWe used data on first episodes of specialty treatment for OUD (n = 671,183) from the Treatment Episode Data Set - Admissions, a national database of publicly funded treatment programs in the US Admissions occurred between 1/2017-12/2022. The primary exposure was being adolescent (15-17 years). The main outcome was planned MOUD use, defined as having MOUD in a treatment plan.

resultsAdolescent specialty treatment episodes for OUD were significantly less likely to have planned MOUD use than adults (aOR 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.09). Linear combination tests of the interaction between age group and year confirmed that adolescent episodes were significantly less likely to have planned MOUD use than adults across all years. In 2021 and 2022 this disparity narrowed slightly. In 2021, adolescent episodes had 10% of the adjusted odds of planned MOUD use compared to adults in 2017 (95% CI, 0.07-0.15). In 2022, adolescent episodes had 9% of the adjusted odds of planned MOUD use compared to adults in 2017 (95% CI, 0.06-0.11).

conclusionAdolescents entering specialty treatment for OUD had significantly lower odds of planned MOUD use than adults. The relatively smaller difference between adolescents and adults in recent years suggests a potential trend toward greater MOUD access, though future research is needed to understand access barriers.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesYoung AdultAdolescent medicineHeroinMedication for opioid use disorderOpioidsOpioid use disorderSpeciality treatment for substance use

Identifiers

PMID41202482
PMCPMC13441448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.