Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41202285›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2025

Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.

Ahmed Abdelfattah Eltomelhussein Ahmed, Arushi Biswas, Nefti Bempong-Ahun, Ines Perić, Eric Patrick O'Flynn

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed Abdelfattah Eltomelhussein AhmedDepartment of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4653-5655
Arushi BiswasJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-1466
Nefti Bempong-AhunThe Global Surgery Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-8152-1546
Ines PerićInstitute of Global Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-759X
Eric Patrick O'FlynnInstitute of Global Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4163-8572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFree Open Access Medical Education has the potential to democratize access to medical knowledge globally; however, this potential remains largely unrealized, particularly in resource-limited settings. Content is increasingly concentrated on a small number of platforms, each hosting large volumes of material compiled from diverse sources.

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize reported barriers and enablers to the successful design, production, and operation of open access medical education platforms, with the goal of informing strategies to improve their impact, reach, and sustainability.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A structured search was carried out on April 17, 2023, in PubMed and EBSCOhost. Citation chaining with the SnowGlobe tool and manual reference checking supplemented the search. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they examined platforms that compile content from multiple sources and reported barriers and enablers. Two reviewers (AAEA and AB) independently screened records and extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer (EPOF). Beginning with an a priori framework of "barriers" and "enablers," coding was then developed inductively. Thematic synthesis categorized findings by stakeholder group.

resultsOf 1108 records identified, 1064 unique records were screened, and 64 full-text papers were assessed; 34 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported barriers were concerns about content-quality control, incomplete or unstructured materials, and the resources needed to sustain platforms long-term. Key enablers included the use of validated tools to assess content quality and collaboration with existing content providers and platforms to enhance visibility and learner engagement. Findings were organized into 3 stakeholder groups: learners and training programs, content designers and creators, and platform managers.

conclusionsOpen access medical education platforms have significant untapped potential to enhance global medical training. Addressing these persistent challenges-particularly around quality assurance, content organization, and sustainability-will require more structured, collaborative, and internationally coordinated approaches.

Indexed as

Access to InformationEducation, DistanceEducation, MedicalHumansbarriersdigital learningeducational technologymedical educationopen access publishingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41202285
PMCPMC12639345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.