ArticlePloS one2025
Convergence and stability analysis of recurrent neural networks for rapid structural damage assessment under seismic loads.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-stationary earthquake responses and sensor noise often make RNN-based damage assessment difficult to optimize and unstable at inference. We develop a stability-controlled, lightweight LSTM that: (i) penalizes gradient overshoot to smooth the update trajectory and prevent exploding/vanishing gradients; (ii) uses a temporal attention gate to emphasize damage-critical segments; and (iii) performs multi-scale sliding-window inference to stabilize long-horizon predictions. Casting the LSTM-with-attention into a discrete-time state-space view, we provide sufficient conditions for non-expansive updates and BIBO stability by bounding the Jacobian spectral norm and constraining attention gains.Empirically, under 10 dB noise our method reaches loss < 0.01 in 18 epochs with only 3 gradient-explosion events, and achieves σ(out)=0.032 with max Δ-rate = 0.085 ± 0.009, outperforming standard LSTM/GRU/BiLSTM/RNN baselines in accuracy, stability, and latency. On-device tests (Jetson Nano) confirm < 5 ms end-to-end delay at 100 Hz, supporting real-time deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.