ArticlePloS one2025
Graph neural networks for integrated information and major complex estimation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of graph neural networks (GNNs) for estimating system-level integrated information and major complex in integrated information theory (IIT) 3.0. Owing to the hierarchical complexity of IIT 3.0, calculating the integrated information and identifying the major complex are computationally prohibitive for large systems. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a GNN model with transformer convolutions characterized by multi-head attention mechanisms for estimating the major complex and its integrated information. For evaluation, we begin by obtaining exact solutions for integrated information and major complexes in systems with 5, 6, and 7 nodes, and conduct two experiments: (1) a non-extrapolative setting in which the model is trained and tested on a mixture of systems with 5, 6, and 7 nodes, and (2) an extrapolative setting in which systems with 5 and 6 nodes are used for training and systems with 7 nodes are used for testing. We then examine the scaling behavior for tree-like, fully connected, and loop-containing graph topologies in larger systems. Although accurate estimation is difficult, our approximate estimates for larger systems generally preserve the qualitative patterns of integrated information and major complex size that are observed in small systems. Finally, based on this observation, we qualitatively analyze a split-brain-like system of 100 nodes. The system consists of two weakly coupled subsystems of 50 nodes each, representing a structurally meaningful, brain-inspired configuration. When the connectivity between the subsystems is low, "local integration" emerges, and a single subsystem forms a major complex. As the connectivity increases, local integration rapidly disappears, and the integrated information gradually rises toward "global integration," in which a large portion of the entire system forms a major complex. Our analysis suggests that the proposed GNN-based framework provides a practical approach to qualitative analysis of integrated information and major complexes in large systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.