ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of exercise modalities on heart rate recovery and its association with cardiometabolic risk in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAttenuated heart rate recovery (HRR) immediately after exercise is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults. We examined the effects of aerobic exercise (AE), resistance exercise (RE), and combined AE and RE on HRR, and the relationship of HRR with body composition and metabolic risk factors in adolescents with overweight or obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe included 147 adolescents (BMI ≥ 85th percentile, 12-18 years) who participated in exercise intervention studies (3-6 months), and had a complete data set including VO2peak, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and cardiometabolic risk factors before and after the interventions. HRR was calculated as the difference between peak HR during the maximal treadmill test and HR at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min after the cessation of the test.
resultsAfter interventions, a faster HRR at 2-5 min was observed following AE (17.3-25.6% change, P < 0.0001), RE (7.1-10.9%, P < 0.05), and combined AE and RE (10.7-12.0%, P < 0.05) compared to pre-intervention. Compared to controls, AE (14.0-24.0%, P < 0.05) was the only exercise group to exhibit a significantly faster HRR at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min after the exercise intervention. Collapsed across exercise groups, improvements in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min HRR are independently associated (P < 0.05) with increases in VO2peak. Changes in HRR were not associated with the changes in % body fat or metabolic risk factors.
conclusionAE training is more beneficial than RE or combined AE and RE training for improving HRR in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.