ArticlePloS one2025
Determining organizational resilience through employee resilient characteristics and supportive HR practices: The moderating effect of managerial resilience.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resilience policies enable organizations to confront with adverse circumstances and ensure businesses operational continuity. Nevertheless, so far literature lacks how employee coping mechanism and supportive HR practices foster organizational resilience. Therefore, current study establishes research framework that combines factors such as employee resilience, psychological safety, problem focused coping, emotion focused coping, supportive human resource practices and workplace friendship and examine impact of these factors on organizational resilience. Similarly, this study has conceptualized moderating effect of managerial resilience between organizational resilience and organizational performance. The quantitative research design is taken into consideration. Data are collected through structured survey questionnaire. Overall, 421 respondents have participated in this organizational resilience research survey. These numerical responses are tested with structural equation modeling approach. Statistical results indicate that employee resilience, psychological safety, problem focused coping, emotion focused coping, supportive human resource practices and workplace friendship have depicted [Formula: see text]= 45.4% variance in organizational resilience. Therefore, constructs like organizational resilience and managerial resilience have shown [Formula: see text]=55.8% variance in organizational performance. Therefore, IPMA analysis has disclosed that emotion focused coping, employee resilience and managerial resilience are found most influential factors in measuring organizational resilience. This study has conceptualized employee coping mechanism towards organizational resilience and hence largely contributes to organizational resilience literature. To practice this study has suggested that factors such as employee resilience, psychological safety, problem focused coping, emotion focused coping and supportive human resource practices are crucial factors in improving organizational resilience and hence need policymakers attention. More precisely managers could enhance organizational resilience by improving employee emotion focused coping, employee resilience and managerial resilience. This research is original as it develops an amalgamated model that combines employee coping mechanism and supportive HR practices altogether to investigate organizational resilience. Likewise, the scope of this study is also ample as it collects observations from managers at border scale and test research framework with numerical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.