Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41202063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with gastric cancer.

Tian Zhang, Lingling Guan, Xiaomeng Xie, Juecai Chen, Dongjing Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tian ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shiyan People's Hospital of Bao'an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lingling GuanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Heyuan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaomeng XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Heyuan, Guangdong, China.
Juecai ChenDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Dongjing NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Hospital of Jinan University, Heyuan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6170-5511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the excess cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk in patients with gastric cancer (GC) compared with the general population.

methodsUsing data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of 41,083 GC patients ≥30 years old between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2021. A reference cohort from the corresponding general population was also included. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for CVD mortality were estimated using Poisson regression.

resultsGC patients were associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality relative to the general population (IRR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.40-1.52). The relative risk was highest among younger patients aged 30-39 years (IRR: 7.69; 95% CI: 2.48-23.86). Cardiovascular mortality risk peaked during the first month after cancer diagnosis (IRR: 11.52; 95% CI: 9.97-13.31). The relationship between GC and CVD mortality varied according to demographic and clinical characteristics.

conclusionsThese population-based findings support early cardiac assessment and comprehensive risk stratification in GC care. Prospective studies with richer confounder data are needed to test whether these strategies improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41202063
PMCPMC12594414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.