ArticlePloS one2025
Efficient DNA extraction from cytogenetic suspensions: A new possibility for obtaining DNA, with potential applications in studies of molecular markers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study demonstrates the viability of extracting DNA for genomic analyses from cell suspensions prepared for cytogenetic analyses, specifically, samples fixed in Carnoy's solution (3:1 methanol: acetic acid) and stored at -20 °C for more than 10 years. Cell suspensions from 27 specimens of fish of the subfamily Loricariinae, which had been prepared originally for cytogenetic studies, were used to test a DNA extraction procedure based on a routinely-used protocol with specific minor adjustments. The spectrophotometric and electrophoretic analyses of the extracted samples revealed DNA at good concentrations (5.9-1739 ng.μL-1) and high purity (A260/A280 ratios of 1.75-2.07), indicating negligible contamination and no significant fragmentation. The integrity of the material was confirmed by the successful amplification by PCR of four different genes (COI, 5S, 18S, and RAG2), with the COI gene being sequenced efficiently. These results demonstrate that DNA can be extracted from samples collected for other purposes, even after long-term storage, producing high-quality genomic DNA from sources that might otherwise be overlooked. The exploitation of these samples as a source of DNA represents a useful potential strategy for the acquisition of material for analysis when fresh samples are scarce or difficult to obtain. This novel approach expands considerably the possibilities for retrospective molecular studies, especially in the fields of conservation and systematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.