ArticlePloS one2025
Trends in non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia: A nationwide study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the prevalence of insomnia disorder in Korea is gradually increasing, understanding real-world treatment patterns is essential for designing appropriate clinical guidelines. Although non-pharmacological treatments are recommended as first-line interventions, their actual use in clinical settings remains insufficiently studied. This study examined the current status of non-pharmacological treatments for insomnia implemented by Korean doctors.
methodsData from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) sample cohort, comprising 518,119 patients diagnosed with insomnia disorder (ICD-10 code: G47) between 2002 and 2019, were analyzed. Treatment types at the time of first diagnosis and the timing of non-pharmacological treatment initiation were assessed.
resultsOnly 0.01% of patients received non-pharmacological treatment at their first diagnosis, and 97.5% did not receive such treatment during the study period. Among those who eventually received it, the interval from diagnosis to treatment initiation decreased over time. A modest increase in the use of non-pharmacological treatments was observed after 2018, following changes in national insurance coverage.
conclusionThe findings highlight a significant gap between clinical guidelines and real-world practice. Although non-pharmacological treatments remain underutilized, recent improvements suggest potential for better integration into routine care, emphasizing the need for ongoing efforts to enhance access to recommended therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.