ArticlePloS one2025
A qualitative analysis of women's reproductive agency and postpartum family planning in Maharashtra, India.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the benefits of healthy birth spacing for mothers and infants, the use of postpartum family planning (PPFP) by women in India remains low. We qualitatively examined barriers to PPFP access and use to understand the intersections between women's reproductive agency, fertility and contraceptive norms, and community interactions with health providers in rural Maharashtra, India.
methodsWe conducted 62 qualitative in-depth interviews with postpartum women, husbands and mothers-in-law of postpartum women, frontline health workers (FLWs) and key community stakeholders in rural Maharashtra from March to May 2022. Semi-structured interview guides included probes related to knowledge of and access to PPFP services, contraceptive decision-making dynamics, interactions with health providers, community norms related to fertility and family planning, and existing and aspirational models for PPFP service delivery. We used an inductive approach to organize emerging codes into themes using Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, categorizing findings into a thematic framework to inform PPFP programming.
resultsFive key themes emerged: (1) Few women received PPFP counseling or services, with marginalized communities disproportionately affected by poor access. (2) Postpartum women lacked agency in contraceptive decision-making and often needed their husband's approval to access PPFP services. (3) Clinicians identified misinformation, lack of education, and community beliefs in contraceptive myths for lack of informed choice. (4) While norms for limiting family size were strong, contraception was considered a 'sensitive' subject and sparked concerns regarding confidentiality in discussing PPFP. (5) Community reported that counseling services were prescriptive and lacked information on the side effects of contraception, leading to the perception of low-quality care and dissatisfaction with PPFP health services.
conclusionsThere is an urgent need to enhance PPFP counseling and service provision within family planning programs in India, emphasize reproductive choice among women, broaden the public dialogue on contraceptive use and find ways to engage men in contraceptive decision making. Interventions that can enhance knowledge and change acceptability of contraception in the community will enhance informed choice for contraceptive use among couples as well as PPFP access and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.