Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201871›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2026

Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jan-Stephan F Sanders, Silke E de Boer, Jip Jonker, Frederike J Bemelman, Michiel G H Betjes, Aiko P J de Vries, Luuk Hilbrands, Marc Hilhorst, Dirk R J Kuypers, Priya Vart and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03797196 (Open Label Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Low Exposure Tacrolimus Regimen in Combination With Everolimus in de Novo Renal Transplantation in Elderly Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03797196 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

Open Label Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Low Exposure Tacrolimus Regimen in Combination With Everolimus in de Novo Renal Transplantation in Elderly Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2019 to 2026Enrolled374ConditionsRenal Transplant Recipients, Elderly Patients, ImmunosuppressionArmslow dose tacrolimus in combination with everolimus, standard dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jan-Stephan F SandersDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0904-3969
Silke E de BoerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7812-8221
Jip JonkerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-9548-4985
Frederike J BemelmanRenal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-6270
Michiel G H BetjesDivision of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9435-6208
Aiko P J de VriesDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-3595
Luuk HilbrandsDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-9765
Marc HilhorstRenal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-7171
Dirk R J KuypersDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-9680
Priya VartDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arjan D van ZuilenDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-5533
Dennis A HesselinkDivision of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1871-1962
Stefan P BergerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2228-4676

Funding

ZonMw, Chiesi Farmaceutici 848042001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsLow-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in older kidney transplant recipients. Low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in better kidney function or fewer infections in older kidney transplant recipients.

backgroundWe hypothesized that older kidney transplant recipients receiving low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone (TEP) have better outcomes than patients receiving standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone (TMP).

methodsThe OPTIMIZE study was a randomized clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients age ≥65 years. Patients receiving a kidney from a deceased donor older than 65 years (stratum A) or a kidney from a deceased donor younger than 65 years or a living donor (stratum B) were included. Patients were randomized to TEP or TMP groups. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TEP group were 5-7 ng/ml until 3 months, 2-4 ng/ml from 3 to 6 months, and 1.5-4 ng/ml from 6 months onwards. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TMP group were 8-12, 6-10, and 5-8 ng/ml. Everolimus target trough levels were 3-6 µ g/L. The primary end point of successful transplantation was defined as being alive with a functioning graft with an eGFR above a predefined threshold at 2 years after transplantation. Predefined eGFR thresholds were 30 (stratum A) or 45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (stratum B).

resultsA total of 379 patients were randomized, of whom 198 were in stratum A (TEP 97, TMP 101) and 181 in stratum B (TEP 90, TMP 91). The median trough levels for everolimus and tacrolimus were within the target range throughout the study. There was no statistically significant difference in successful transplantation at 2 years between the groups (TEP 94 [50%], TMP 110 [57%]; difference 7% [95% confidence interval, -17 to 3] P = 0.91). Regarding the predefined secondary outcomes, patient survival (TEP 167 [89%], TMP 171 [89%]; P = 0.95) and graft survival (TEP 155 [83%], TMP 162 [84%]; P = 0.65) did not differ significantly. Within strata A and B, there were no significant differences in the end points.

conclusionsImmunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in de novo older kidney transplant recipients compared with immunosuppression with standard-dose TMP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03797196 .

Indexed as

Graft RejectionImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationAgedAge FactorsDrug Therapy, CombinationEverolimusFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidPrednisoloneTacrolimusEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidPrednisoloneTacrolimusclinical trialimmunosuppressionkidney transplantationsurvival analysistacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID41201871
PMCPMC13065175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.