Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201834›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Clinical and Genomic Factors Associated with Elacestrant Outcomes in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Maxwell R Lloyd, Caroline M Weipert, Azka Ali, Sheila R Solomon, Jayati Saha, Marla D Lipsyc-Sharf, Erika P Hamilton, Kevin Kalinsky, Adam M Brufsky, Aditya Bardia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maxwell R LloydBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9810-0437
Caroline M WeipertGuardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-882X
Azka AliCleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-6664
Sheila R SolomonGuardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-588X
Jayati SahaGuardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2613-9441
Marla D Lipsyc-SharfUCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4071-6383
Erika P HamiltonSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-0336
Kevin KalinskyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-7902
Adam M BrufskyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-7960
Aditya BardiaUCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-1157
Nicole ZhangGuardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California.ORCID 0009-0001-2706-5838
Seth A WanderMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-4708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeESR1 mutations mediate resistance to antiestrogen therapy in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, improves progression-free survival over standard endocrine therapy in ESR1-mutant MBC. We assessed real-world elacestrant use and clinical-genomic factors associated with outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis study used the GuardantINFORM database, linking >42,000 real-world breast cancer cases with sequencing and claims data. We included patients with activating ESR1 mutations detected <6 months before elacestrant initiation (January 2023-March 2024). Outcomes of time-to-treatment-discontinuation, time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis, adjusting for clinical variables.

resultsWe identified 756 patients (76% with prior cyclin-dependent kinase-4/6 inhibitor and 38% with prior chemotherapy exposure), and 742 (98.2%) were evaluable for outcomes. The median TTNT was 6.4 months, and the time-to-treatment-discontinuation was 4.6 months. In those with ≤1 prior lines of metastatic therapy, the TTNT was 8.8 months, compared with 6.0 months in the third-line setting. Prior fulvestrant exposure trended toward shorter treatment duration (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.56). Higher ESR1 polyclonality (≥4 alterations; 11% of patients) correlated with a shorter TTNT of 5.2 months (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.06), but efficacy was consistent across ESR1 alleles (e.g., Y537S and D538G). Disease with dual ESR1 and PI3K pathway mutations (PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN) had a median TTNT of 5.2 months.

conclusionsIn ESR1-mutant MBC, elacestrant treatment durations support the routine use of elacestrant monotherapy in appropriately selected patients. For patients with concurrent ESR1 and PI3K pathway mutations, single-agent activity was comparable with outcomes observed in phase III studies. See related article by Rugo et al., p. 179.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaMutationAdultAgedFemaleGenomicsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID41201834
PMCPMC12770935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.