Does Maximal Strength or Speed-Strength Have Stronger Associations with Performance Indicators in the Rugby Football Codes? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Lachlan P James, Vincent G Kelly, Jonathon Weakley, Rich D Johnston, Minh Huynh

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis

In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lachlan P JamesSport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, Department of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, Human Services, and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. l.james@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0598-5502

Vincent G KellySchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Jonathon WeakleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Rich D JohnstonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Minh HuynhSport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, Department of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, Human Services, and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth maximal strength and speed-strength are considered key aspects of rugby league and rugby union match-play yet represent distinct physical qualities. Establishing whether maximal strength or speed-strength has a greater association with game performance in these sports can help direct resistance training interventions towards the physical quality most likely to transfer to the outcome of interest. It is therefore important to develop a clearer understanding of whether it is maximal strength or speed-strength that has stronger links to key aspects of rugby union and rugby league competition.

objectivesTo systematically review and meta-analyse the literature to compare maximal strength versus speed-strength measures in their associations with within-game key performance indicators (KPIs) in rugby union and rugby league. Further, sub-group analysis was undertaken to determine whether the type of KPI (tackles, rucks, line breaks, carries/hit-ups, errors, and miscellaneous) moderated the extent to which the observed effect favoured maximal strength or speed-strength for a given KPI.

methodsA systematic search, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, of Web of Science, PubMed, and SportDiscus was conducted up to December 2024. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria provided correlation coefficients that were converted into Fisher's z-transformed effect sizes to standardise the measures and allow for consistent comparison across studies. These effect sizes were analysed using a multivariate meta-analysis framework.

resultsSix studies containing 41 maximal strength versus speed-strength comparisons and 134 players were included in the final analysis. Of the 786 studies initially identified, 28 underwent full-text screening, with 22 ultimately excluded. The overall pooled effect was 0.24 [0.11: 0.37] in favour of strength; however, the prediction interval ranged from g = - 0.58 to g = 1.06. The moderator analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of type (p = 0.038), indicating stronger associations for maximal strength compared to speed-strength. Residual heterogeneity (p = 0.005) suggested substantial variability in effect sizes across studies that was not fully explained by the model.

conclusionsWithin-game rugby union and rugby league KPIs typically have stronger links to maximal strength than to speed-strength. However, the wide prediction interval underscores that the observed maximal strength advantage may not generalise across all types of KPIs or predictably translate to all future settings.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceFootballMuscle StrengthHumansResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID41201787

DOI10.1007/s40279-025-02342-y

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.