ReviewCurrent medical science2025
Artificial Intelligence for Spleen-Stomach Disorders in Traditional Chinese Medicine: Integrating Knowledge Graphs with Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment.
Review in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spleen-Stomach disorders are prevalent clinical conditions in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). The complex diagnostic and treatment model used in TCM is based on a "symptom-pattern-disease-formula" framework that heavily relies on practitioners' experience. However, this model faces several challenges, including ambiguous knowledge representation, unstructured data, and difficulties with knowledge sharing. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, natural language processing, and medical knowledge engineering have significantly improved research on knowledge graphs (KGs) and intelligent diagnosis and treatment systems for these disorders, making these technologies crucial for modernizing TCM. This article systematically reviews two core research pathways related to Spleen-Stomach disorders. The first pathway focuses on constructing knowledge graphs for "structured knowledge representation". This includes ontology modeling, entity recognition, relation extraction, graph fusion, semantic reasoning, visualization services, and an ensemble model to predict treatment efficacy. The second pathway involves the development of intelligent diagnosis and treatment systems, with a focus on "clinical applications". This pathway includes key technologies such as quantitative modeling of TCM, the four diagnostic methods (inspection, auscultation-olfaction, interrogation, and palpation), semantic analysis of classical texts, pattern differentiation algorithms, and multimodal consultation recommenders. Through the synthesis and analysis of current research, several ongoing challenges have been identified. These include inconsistent models and annotation of TCM clinical knowledge, limited semantic reasoning capabilities, insufficient integration between KGs and intelligent diagnostic models, and limited clinical adaptability of existing intelligent diagnostic systems. To address these challenges, this review suggests future research directions that include enhancing heterogeneous multisource knowledge integration techniques, deepening semantic reasoning through collaborative reasoning frameworks that incorporate large language models, and developing effective cross-disease transfer learning strategies. These directions aim to improve interpretability, reasoning accuracy, and clinical applicability of intelligent diagnosis and treatment systems for Spleen-Stomach disorders in TCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41201780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.