Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201776›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026

Knowledge and attitude regarding preventive and minimally invasive caries treatments: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch dental professionals.

C P M Elsenberg, M H van der Veen, L Kwakkenbos, D D Vreeken, M D Lagerweij, C M C Volgenant

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Current practice, barriers and facilitators to caries management in children: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C P M ElsenbergDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. karen.elsenberg@radboudumc.nl.
M H van der VeenResearch Group Collaborating on Oral Health, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
L KwakkenbosDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
D D VreekenDepartment of Cariology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M D LagerweijDepartment of Cariology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C M C VolgenantDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Dutch guideline "Oral care for children: prevention and treatment of caries" describes how to prevent, stabilise, or treat caries lesions using minimally invasive methods in children. The objectives of the present study were to 1) evaluate to what extent oral healthcare professionals (OHCPs) in the Netherlands apply preventive and minimally invasive caries management according to the guideline, 2) evaluate their attitudes towards these treatments, and 3) assess differences between OHCPs in general oral health practice and paediatric dentistry.

methodsIn this cross-sectional survey study, OHCPs completed questions on guideline knowledge, and practice regarding primary (5 items), secondary and tertiary (9 items) caries prevention was asked using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never, 5 = always). Attitude towards minimally invasive caries treatments was evaluated as sum score over six statements (range 6 [negative] to 30 [positive]).

resultsAmongst 187 participants (36.7% paediatric dentists; 79.1% female), 134 (71.7%) OHCPs reported being familiar with the guideline content. OHCPs working in paediatric dentistry applied statistically significantly more primary and (partially) secondary and tertiary prevention than OHCPs in general oral health practice. Median score of attitude towards minimally invasive caries treatments was neutral at 17.2 (SD = 2.6).

conclusionThe majority of OHCPs in the present study reported being familiar with the guideline. However there is room for improvement in its implementation in practice. OHCPs working in paediatric dentistry reported greater familiarity with the guideline. Generally, OHCPs had a neutral attitude towards preventive caries management.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDental Care for ChildrenDental CariesDentistsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePractice Patterns, Dentists'AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeGuidelineMinimally invasive caries managementPaediatric dentistryPrevention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.