ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Real-world outcomes of venetoclax and azacitidine in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (VENUS study).
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Host Fitness: A Missing Dimension of Precision Medicine in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Hematological oncology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venetoclax (VEN) with azacitidine (AZA) is the standard treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, real-world evidence on dosing, scheduling, and outcomes is lacking, particularly for patients with prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or AZA treatment, who have been excluded from clinical trials. This was a multicenter retrospective study of VEN + AZA in 120 patients newly diagnosed with AML between June 2021 and September 2022. The cohort had a median age of 77 years, 52% had secondary AML, 74% had previously been diagnosed with MDS, and 39% had previously received AZA. During cycle 1, half of the patients received 400 mg of VEN for a median of 27 days, with a median holding period of 12 days. With a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery was 56.7% in VEN + AZA-treated patients in the overall cohort and 56.5% in patients with prior MDS. Median overall survival was 14.8 months for the overall cohort and 15.4 months for those with prior MDS. The real-world outcomes were comparable to those of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.