ReviewInternational ophthalmology2025
An extensive analysis of machine learning techniques for identifying glaucoma.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Multimodal OCT and OCTA Analysis Reveals Structural and Vascular Features of Mild Glaucoma Across Ethnicities.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy, and it's one of the leading causes of permanent blindness in the world. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have recently emerged as effective tools in diagnosing glaucoma, and early detection is crucial in the prevention of vision loss. In this review, the recent developments in ML algorithms in the diagnosis of glaucoma, their performance, drawbacks, and clinical applications are analyzed. There have been promising results when combining imaging modes including fundus images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) with machine learning models. However, problems persist in poor multi-modal data integration, limited generalizability, and a lack of explainability. The importance of multi-modal techniques, interpretable models, and robust datasets to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ML algorithms is stressed by this study. There are many recommendations for further study to achieve clinical acceptability, which include building standardized frameworks and controlling diversity in data. Therefore, it highlights the current and future potential of ML regarding glaucoma. A total of 30 papers were reviewed from 2019 to 2024, with an increase in research activity. From 2019 to 2021, there were 3 papers reviewed per year, and it increased to 5 in 2022, peaked at 9 in 2023, and then decreased to 7 in 2024, reflecting growing yet fluctuating interest in this topic. The pattern depicts growing interest in the field and body of literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41201652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.