Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201652›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2025

An extensive analysis of machine learning techniques for identifying glaucoma.

R Vinod Kumar, N Sharmila Banu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Vinod KumarResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India. vinodasdhoni@gmail.com.
N Sharmila BanuAssistant Professor, Department of computer science, School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy, and it's one of the leading causes of permanent blindness in the world. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have recently emerged as effective tools in diagnosing glaucoma, and early detection is crucial in the prevention of vision loss. In this review, the recent developments in ML algorithms in the diagnosis of glaucoma, their performance, drawbacks, and clinical applications are analyzed. There have been promising results when combining imaging modes including fundus images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) with machine learning models. However, problems persist in poor multi-modal data integration, limited generalizability, and a lack of explainability. The importance of multi-modal techniques, interpretable models, and robust datasets to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ML algorithms is stressed by this study. There are many recommendations for further study to achieve clinical acceptability, which include building standardized frameworks and controlling diversity in data. Therefore, it highlights the current and future potential of ML regarding glaucoma. A total of 30 papers were reviewed from 2019 to 2024, with an increase in research activity. From 2019 to 2021, there were 3 papers reviewed per year, and it increased to 5 in 2022, peaked at 9 in 2023, and then decreased to 7 in 2024, reflecting growing yet fluctuating interest in this topic. The pattern depicts growing interest in the field and body of literature.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalGlaucomaIntraocular PressureMachine LearningTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsHumansAnd Medical Imaging analysisExplainable AIFundus imagingGlaucoma detectionMachine learningMulti-modal data integrationOptical coherence tomography (OCT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.