Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201645›Full record

ArticleBiodegradation2025

Biodegradation of chlorantraniliprole by Klebsiella spp. and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Bimal Kumar Sahoo, A Suganthi, P S Shanmugam, R Anandham, N Swarnakumari, P Meenakshi, Mohammad Ikram, P Karthik, Iqra Ali, P Thangachamy and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Application potential ofOpen life sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bimal Kumar SahooDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
A SuganthiDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India. suganthi.a@tnau.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0001-7013-4459
P S ShanmugamDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
R AnandhamDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
N SwarnakumariDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
P MeenakshiDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Mohammad IkramDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
P KarthikDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Iqra AliDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
P ThangachamyDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
K KiruthikaDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India IF220218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorantraniliprole, as a widely used plant protection product, raises concerns about the environment due to its moderately persistent residues. The present investigation involved the in vitro degradation of chlorantraniliprole by bacteria isolated from farmgate fruits and vegetables from pesticide-intensive fields. A total of 10 different bacterial isolates were obtained and characterised through several morphological characters as well as biochemical tests and 16S rRNA sequencing. Out of the total 10 isolates, 9 were from the genus Klebsiella and 1 from Staphylococcus. The degradation of chlorantraniliprole was assessed using the ten isolates of bacteria in diluted nutrient broth at two different inoculum concentrations (1 and 5%) over three different time intervals (0, 5, and 10 days after inoculation). K. pneumoniae (PPCO1) was found to be the most potent bacterium for degradation of chlorantraniliprole, with a degradation capability of 85.36%, over other isolates and degradation was lowest in S. epidermidis (PSGCO1) (77.32%) on the 10th day after inoculation. These results highlight the potential of Klebsiella spp. and S. epidermidis as promising candidates for the removal of chlorantraniliprole residues in broth under controlled conditions; however, field validation is essential to confirm their efficacy in mitigating pesticide residues under natural environmental settings.

Indexed as

Klebsiellaortho-AminobenzoatesStaphylococcus epidermidisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalInsecticidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SchlorantranilipoleInsecticidesortho-AminobenzoatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBioremediationChlorantraniliproleDegradationKlebsiellaStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID41201645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.