Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201604›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Sensor-based monitoring of fracture healing].

Manuela Ernst, Markus Windolf, Boyko Gueorguiev, Tim Pohlemann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuela ErnstAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Schweiz. manuela.ernst@aofoundation.org.
Markus WindolfAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Schweiz.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Schweiz.
Tim PohlemannKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postoperative assessment of fracture healing remains a clinical challenge despite established treatment standards. The lack of reliable information on the mechanical stability of the fracture complicates individualized follow-up care. This increases the risk of delayed mobilization, implant overload or late detection of healing complications.Sensor-based implants, such as the AO Fracture Monitor enable objective, continuous measurement of implant load, offering a novel approach to evaluating the healing process. Preclinical studies demonstrate a significant correlation between mechanical load and radiological healing parameters, confirming the potential of instrumented implants for diagnostic and preventive applications. Initial clinical data are currently being collected as part of a multicenter study. Additional application areas, such as spinal fusion and hip fracture treatment are the focus of ongoing research and commercial development efforts.Continuous data acquisition enables uninterrupted remote monitoring, independent of scheduled follow-up examinations. This opens new possibilities for dynamic adjustment of treatment protocols, early detection of complications and targeted rehabilitation management; however, integrating such systems into routine clinical practice poses substantial regulatory and procedural challenges. Current studies therefore provide an essential foundation for the gradual establishment of personalized follow-up strategies in routine clinical care.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicAftercareFracture fixationImplant loadPersonalized medicineRemote patient monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.