Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201545›Full record

SynthesisAmbio2026

Towards improved ecosystem service assessments in marine systems: A systematic review and evaluation of effectiveness.

Juliana Socrate, Aurelija Armoskaite, Víctor Cordero Penín, Débora Gutierrez, Miriam von Thenen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliana SocrateCoastal Sea Geography Group, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany. juliana.socrate@io-warnemuende.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-2439
Aurelija ArmoskaiteLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8040-5742
Víctor Cordero PenínBiodiversity and Conservation Group (BIOCON), IU-ECOAQUA, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Canary Islands, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0272-1875
Débora GutierrezFaculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), University of the Azores (UAc), Rua da Mãe de Deus, 9500-321, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1311-5459
Miriam von ThenenCoastal Sea Geography Group, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-2564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) are widely used to support marine management, yet their application varies across regions due to differences in governance frameworks, data availability, and methodological approaches. This study systematically reviews ESA methods and tools applied in offshore areas of the Baltic Sea, South Atlantic Ocean, and Western Mediterranean Sea, evaluating their effectiveness in supporting sustainable marine management with a specific focus on offshore wind farms, marine protected areas, and fishing activities. The findings reveal geographical variations in ESA implementation, highlighting strengths and limitations in their ability to inform policy and decision-making. While methodological diversity enhances ESA's capacity to capture complex socio-ecological interactions, inconsistencies in application reduce its effectiveness. Addressing these gaps requires refining methodological approaches, strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, and improving the link between ESA and marine governance. This research provides insights into the current state of ESA applications and offers recommendations for enhancing their role in ecosystem-based marine planning and policy integration.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesMediterranean SeaOceans and SeasEcosystem service assessmentsEvaluation of effectivenessMarine ecosystemsRegional comparisonsSustainable marine planning

Identifiers

PMID41201545
PMCPMC13230327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.