Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201543›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025

Effect of vortex fluidic device and its combined treatment with ultrasonication on the conformational changes of soy protein isolate.

Ankita Kumari, Abdul Rahaman, Ibrahim Khalifa, Muhammad Adil Farooq, Xin-An Zeng, Narpinder Singh, Shan He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ankita KumariSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China; School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Abdul RahamanSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: rahaman_knabdul@ymail.com.
Ibrahim KhalifaFood Technology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, 13736, Moshtohor, Benha University, Egypt.
Muhammad Adil FarooqDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences 102 Benbow Hall North Carolina A&T State University Greensboro, NC, USA.
Xin-An ZengSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China; School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: xazeng@scut.edu.cn.
Narpinder SinghDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Shan HeSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia. Electronic address: he0091@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the functional properties of Soy Protein Isolate (SPI) is critical for its effective application in the food industry. The present study explored SPI modification through twomethods: (1) varying the rotational speed of a Vortex Fluidic Device (VFD) between 2000 and 8000 rpm, and (2) integrating Ultrasound (US) treatment (40 kHz, 220 V; 10-50 min) in combination with VFD operation at 8000 rpm. VFD treatment reduced substantial particle size (from 1732 nm to 591.6 nm) and increased the denaturation temperature (Tp) to 109.56 °C, indicating enhanced thermal stability. While the secondary structure was largely stable, a specific conformational shift occurred at VFD6000, marked by a ∼6.7 % decrease in β-turns and a ∼2.9 % increase in β-sheets. In contrast, the synergistic USVFD treatment induced more pronounced structural changes; the US30VFD8000 condition increased β-sheet content by ∼7.4 % and promoted re-aggregation (particle size ∼761.5 nm vs. 623.1 nm for VFD8000), albeit with a slight reduction in Tp to 107.79 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) confirmed that USVFD accelerated degradation, increasing mass loss to ∼36.7 % (vs. ∼29.4 % for native SPI) and reducing final residue to ∼21.2 % (vs. ∼25.3 % for VFD8000). SEM imaging clearly illustrated these trends, revealing fragmented structures after VFD and uniform aggregates with clusters following USVFD treatment. These findings demonstrate that VFD treatment primarily unfolds and fragments SPI, while USVFD promotes re-aggregation into a modified structure. This provides a strategic basis for tailoring SPI functionality, VFD for thermal stability and USVFD for improved hydration, enabling targeted applications in food design.

Indexed as

SonicationSoybean ProteinsParticle SizeProtein ConformationTemperatureSoybean Proteinsand AggregationSecondary structureSoy protein isolateUltrasonicationVortex fluidic device

Identifiers

PMID41201543
PMCPMC12596217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.