Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201533›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2025

Optimization of Mitotic Index Quantification Using the Amnis ImageStream Imaging Flow Cytometer.

I V Kholodenko, K N Yarygin, Y S Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I V KholodenkoInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
K N YaryginInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Y S KimInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia. yankimhcc@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mitotic index is a critical indicator of the proliferative activity of cell populations and is widely used in oncology and stem cell research. One of the most promising methods for its assessment is imaging flow cytometry implemented on the Amnis ImageStream platform using the IDEAS software. A critical evaluation of the built-in Wizards, Cell Cycle-Mitosis algorithm revealed several limitations, including a high degree of operator-dependent variability in gate setting and difficulties in identifying the mitotic population in the absence of distinct peaks on the cell cycle histogram. An alternative approach, the Mean + xSD algorithm, was proposed. This method is based on automated quantitative assessment of the Bright Detail Intensity R3 parameter and excludes the need for manual gating and histogram interpretation. Using the Caco2 and HT-29 cell lines, we demonstrated that the proposed algorithm exhibits accuracy comparable to the classical IDEAS algorithm, and in some cases provides even more reproducible quantification of the mitotic index. These results demonstrate the potential of the new algorithm as a more objective and robust tool for analyzing mitotic activity in cultured cells.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryMitosisMitotic IndexAlgorithmsCaco-2 CellsCell CycleHT29 CellsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwaremitotic index; cell proliferative activity; imaging flow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID41201533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.