Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41201501›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

The sensory ecology of caterpillars.

Sam J England, Callum F McLellan, Rochelle J Meah, J Benito Wainwright, Lauren Sumner-Rooney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam J EnglandDepartment of Evolutionary Morphology, Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany. sam.england@mfn.berlin.
Callum F McLellanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rochelle J MeahSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Benito WainwrightCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Lauren Sumner-RooneyDepartment of Evolutionary Morphology, Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caterpillars (larval Lepidoptera) are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily significant taxa on Earth. As both feeders and food, they shape the dynamics of enumerate ecosystems on land. Key to this prominent role in nature is the sensory systems that inform, guide, and trigger their behaviour. Gaining an understanding of caterpillar sensory ecology therefore promises to reveal fundamental insights into the broader principles of ecology and evolution, conservation and management, within and beyond the Lepidoptera. To facilitate such an understanding, here we review the existing literature on the sensory physiology and ecology of all currently recognised sensory modalities in caterpillars, namely vision, hearing, vibration detection, touch, electroreception, chemoreception, hygroreception, thermoreception, and graviception. In each of these sensory modalities, we also explore the current evidence surrounding the threat of anthropogenic sensory pollution. Taken together, this review reveals the great depth and breadth of research into caterpillar sensory ecology, making clear the value of caterpillars to neuroethology, but also of neuroethology to caterpillars. However, many of the attributes that caterpillars bring to neuroethological research are yet to be taken advantage of. For example, there is currently a lack of comparative sensory system studies on caterpillars, utilising their ecological diversity and existing phylogenetic data. We also highlight many considerable knowledge gaps, most pertinently, the need to identify the sensors responsible for each sensory modality in caterpillars, and to characterise the potential effects of sensory pollution across all of these modalities.

Indexed as

LepidopteraSensationAnimalsHearingLarvaChemoreceptionElectroreceptionHearingLarvaeLepidopteraNeuroethologySensory pollutionTouchVibration detectionVision

Identifiers

PMID41201501
PMCPMC13086807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.