ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
The sensory ecology of caterpillars.
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tiny caterpillars assess threats by the footsteps of their enemies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caterpillars (larval Lepidoptera) are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily significant taxa on Earth. As both feeders and food, they shape the dynamics of enumerate ecosystems on land. Key to this prominent role in nature is the sensory systems that inform, guide, and trigger their behaviour. Gaining an understanding of caterpillar sensory ecology therefore promises to reveal fundamental insights into the broader principles of ecology and evolution, conservation and management, within and beyond the Lepidoptera. To facilitate such an understanding, here we review the existing literature on the sensory physiology and ecology of all currently recognised sensory modalities in caterpillars, namely vision, hearing, vibration detection, touch, electroreception, chemoreception, hygroreception, thermoreception, and graviception. In each of these sensory modalities, we also explore the current evidence surrounding the threat of anthropogenic sensory pollution. Taken together, this review reveals the great depth and breadth of research into caterpillar sensory ecology, making clear the value of caterpillars to neuroethology, but also of neuroethology to caterpillars. However, many of the attributes that caterpillars bring to neuroethological research are yet to be taken advantage of. For example, there is currently a lack of comparative sensory system studies on caterpillars, utilising their ecological diversity and existing phylogenetic data. We also highlight many considerable knowledge gaps, most pertinently, the need to identify the sensors responsible for each sensory modality in caterpillars, and to characterise the potential effects of sensory pollution across all of these modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.